Who Funds and Who Pays:
Analysing the period from 2020 to 2025, the study shows that funding for high-risk solar geoengineering technologies has increased dramatically - more than tenfold. Both 2024 and 2025 saw new peak levels of private funding. Most private funders have strong ties to the tech sector. The overwhelming majority of funding originates in the Global North: The majority of funding for solar geoengineering comes from the US and UK, and nearly two thirds of recipients of that funding were also based in the US or in Europe. In 2025, the UK's Advanced Research and Invention Agency (ARIA) entered the picture with the largest-ever SRM government research programme that includes five research projects that intend to do outdoor testing.
By examining the funding landscape, this study seeks to contribute to a broader debate about the economic and political interests shaping the research and development of geoengineering technologies - and whose interests these technologies ultimately serve. In particular, the rapid growth in private-sector funding raises concerns that democratic deliberation about whether such high-risk technologies should be further researched and developed may be sidelined.
Product details
Table of contents
Preface
Executive summary
Key findings
Introduction
Critiques of solar geoengineering
Methodology
Solar geoengineering funding
Trends and patterns of funding
Funding of solar geoengineering research
Known funding flows
Direct research grants
General funding
Ultra-rich individuals behindfunder organizations
Solar geoengineering startups
Summary of findings and synthesis
Conclusion: some final considerations
Appendix A: Additional methodological details
Appendix B: Further information about companies and their founders
Appendix C: A brief discussion of some of the recipients of funding
Appendix D: List of organizations’ short names and acronyms
References
The authors
Imprint